The country's leaders, he added, "must come together, they must compromise
with each other to bring the people of Iraq together and save this country."
Mr. Khalilzad's comments are the most explicit acknowledgment so far
by an American official of the instability of the situation, and the fragility of the entire American enterprise here. The
killings and assaults across Iraq that began Wednesday have amounted to the worst sectarian violence since the American invasion.
... In the deadliest assault, 47 people returning from a protest were
pulled off buses south of Baghdad on Wednesday and shot in the head, an Interior Ministry official said Thursday. Three journalists
from Al Arabiya, the Arab satellite network, were abducted and killed Wednesday in Samarra, near the ruined shrine. Seven
American soldiers were also killed Wednesday in unrelated attacks involving roadside bombs.
Political and religious
leaders, including President Jalal Talabani and Moktada al-Sadr, the Shiite cleric whose followers are believed to be involved
in much of the anti-Sunni violence, called for restraint.
We lost seven more guys.
Unrelated. We've become like the Brits in Northern Ireland, trying to keep the two side from killing each other, and getting
picked off by both. Unrelated. Sure.
The political writer Digby here reminds us that Thomas Friedman, the widely-respected and thoughtful columnist for the New York Times once said that
it's not every day you get to see a political experiment in action. Friedman was always big on kicking some butt to "show
our strength" - and it really didn't matter if Iraq was the wrong butt as we had to show we wouldn't be pushed around - and
then was big on the grand experiment to plant a Jeffersonian democracy smack in the middle of that region to shake things
up.
And now? The Marx Brothers in action - without the laughs and with a lot of dead people. And our guys get to keep
the peace, and wonder, if they shoot, which side they other side will think we're taking. Keeping a lid on all this will be
tricky. Maybe it's impossible.
Some of us saw Tony Blankley of the Washington Times on MSNBC's Hardball say
to Chris Matthews maybe we should take sides and become the enforcement arms of the Shiites and Kurds, and destroy
the local Sunnis. Yeah, the new Shiite government is shaping up to be a theocracy aligned with Iran, but maybe that's the
best we can do. They might not be that unfriendly to us. Or so Blankley thinks.
Note this - screen shots of Fox News with the graphic saying a civil war in Iraq may be a blessing in disguise ("All-Out Civil War
in Iraq: Could it be a Good Thing?"). And here, a screenshot and transcript of Terry Jeffery, the editor of pro-Bush Human Events on CNN saying this all proves Bush's
grand plan is working - the idea being that what happened this week in Iraq is all so awful that the sensible people in Iraq
will join together to form a sectarian state that has nothing to do with religion. He's channeling Rufus T. Firefly. He saw
Duck Soup too many times and confused it with real life.
And on the edge of it all. Friday, February 24, 2006
Attack Fails at Huge Saudi Oil Site and Oil Prices Up After Attack in Saudi Arabia. That site? Twenty percent of the world's oil passes through there. It's not every day you get to see a political experiment
in action.
And back here the business with Dubai World Ports only got more absurd. Do we allow a corporation - actually
pretty good at doing what they do but owned by the government of United Arab Emirates - to run operations at six key American
ports? The nation is in an uproars on this - at least most politicians and those who think about policy, and good number of
ordinary folks who don't want to get blown up and hear the United Arab Emirates is where some Arabs live, and that composite
government has been playing both sides. Lou Dobbs on CNN is on a tear, with guests (Joe Klein, Friday) saying if we don't
do this the Arab world we hate us, and Dobbs shooting back "like they don't hate us now after all we've done?" It's all over.
No point in citing everyone saying things.
Thursday the White House had Karl Rove tell us the president understands
folks are upset and the president might think about delaying this (here), and that was the same day Deputy Defense Secretary Gordon England was telling a senate committee "the terrorists will win"
if we don't immediate do this deal (here) - "The terrorists want our nation to become distrustful. They want us to become paranoid and isolationist, and my view
is we cannot allow this to happen. It needs to be just the opposite." And he said opposing this deal was giving aid and
comfort to our enemies, so even the Republicans who have questions are now being called traitors. Welcome aboard, guys.
If
congress passes anything to stop this, will the president veto it? He says he will. But he says that all the time and never
vetoes anything (see The Emperor Has No Vetoes for a discussion of this "the boy who cried wolf" veto business).
But he will veto this –
The Bush administration
said Friday it won't reconsider its approval for a United Arab Emirates company to take over significant operations at six
U.S. ports. The former head of the Sept. 11 commission said the deal "never should have happened."
Opponents, including
the agency that runs New York and New Jersey ports, took their case to court, while the company, Dubai Ports World, stepped
up efforts to change the minds of congressional critics.
The president's national security adviser said the White
House would keep trying to persuade lawmakers - there's more time since the company offered to delay its takeover - but the
administration wouldn't reconsider its approval.
"There are questions raised in the Congress, and what this delay
allows is for those questions to be addressed on the Hill," Stephen Hadley said. "There's nothing to reopen."
Thomas
Kean, a former Republican governor of New Jersey who led the bipartisan probe of the Sept. 11 attacks, said the deal was a
big mistake because of past connections between the 2001 hijackers and the UAE.
So the president might
delay implementation, but it's going to happen, no matter what. Dubai World Ports put their implementation on hold (here), to wait this out (and give the administration some breathing room), and New York and New Jersey are taking the feds to
court.
Great. But none of it matters.
Congress and its laws? The courts? Piffle. The man decided.
And
he says there's nothing to worry about. Trust him, not these other folks. He is the one who protects us from the bad guys.
Everyone knows that.
As Tim Grieve puts it here - "The Bush administration can stand by and let all sorts of things happen - the gutting of Iraqi museums, the abuse of prisoners
at Abu Ghraib and Guantánamo, genocide in Darfur, Sudan - but it can't handle the notion that someone else might be playing
the terrorism trump card."
Or maybe it's this, from Lou Dobb's show on CNN earlier in the week (video here or here and transcript) –
DOBBS: President Bush's
family and members of the Bush administration have long-standing business connections with the United Arab Emirates, and those
connections are raising new concerns and questions tonight in some quarters about why the president is defying his very own
party leadership and his party in defending the Dubai port deal.
CHRISTINE ROMANS: The oil-rich United Arab Emirates
is a major investor in The Carlyle Group, the private equity investment firm where President Bush's father once served as
senior adviser and is a who's who of former high-level government officials. Just last year, Dubai International Capital,
a government-backed buyout firm, invested in an $8 billion Carlyle fund.
Another family connection, the president's
brother, Neil Bush, has reportedly received funding for his educational software company from the UAE investors. A call to
his company was not returned.
Then there is the cabinet connection. Treasury Secretary John Snow was chairman of railroad
company CSX. After he left the company for the White House, CSX sold its international port operations to Dubai Ports World
for more than a billion dollars.
In Connecticut today, Snow told reporters he had no knowledge of that CSX sale. "I
learned of this transaction probably the same way members of the Senate did, by reading about it in the newspapers."
Another
administration connection, President Bush chose a Dubai Ports World executive to head the U.S. Maritime Administration. David
Sanborn, the former director of Dubai Ports' European and Latin American operations, he was tapped just last month to lead
the agency that oversees U.S. port operations.
Ah. Just business. These
folks have done business with these people, and thus they trust them. Should we?
This seems to be some kind of turning
point. Folks are wondering if they should. The warning signs are going up at the conservative National Review, where
you would find this late Friday afternoon from John Podhoretz –
Rasmussen has a new poll
up in which - hold on now - Democrats in Congress are outpolling President Bush on national security. By a margin of 43 to
41 percent, Americans say they trust Congressional Democrats more than Bush when it comes to protecting our national security.
And by a margin of 64-17 percent, they oppose the sale of the ports to Dubai.
The deal is dead. It won't survive after
a 45-day extension or a 450-day extension. Congressional Republicans have no choice but to be extremely aggressive and nasty
toward the president and the White House, because they will be properly terrified of looking like Bush's lapdogs on a hugely
unpopular matter that goes to the heart of the Republican party's political advantage in the United States.
If the
White House doesn't handle this well in the next three days, the political consequences could be catastrophic.
And putting more bluntly,
Rich Lowry adds - "Emergency, indeed: if Bush loses his edge on national security, he has nothing left."
And these are Bush guys.
This is a political mess. And it had to come.
See this from Michael Hirsh in Newsweek - "How then did we arrive at this day, with anti-American Islamist governments rising
in the Mideast, bin Laden sneering at us, Qaeda lieutenants escaping from prison, Iran brazenly enriching uranium, and America
as hated and mistrusted as it ever has been? The answer, in a word, is incompetence."
Kevin Drum in the Washington
Monthly adds this –
Yes, there's been incompetence
to spare, but there's also been considered policy at work, policy that deliberately marginalized our allies, tackled fake
threats at the expense of real ones, made preemptive war our default preference, and criminally misjudged the actual nature
of the conflict we're in. Even if it had been executed well, it still would have been disastrous.
But sure: incompetent
too. The damage that George Bush has done to the United States is going to be with us for a very long time.
The ports deal seems to
have just brought up the underlying problem.
See William Greider in The Nation here –
So why is the fearmonger-in-chief
being so casual about this Dubai business? Because at some level of consciousness even George Bush knows the inflated fears
are bogus. So do a lot of the politicians merrily throwing spears at him. He taught them how to play this game, invented the
tactics and reorganized political competition as a demagogic dance of hysterical absurdities, endless opportunities to waste
public money. Very few dare to challenge the mindset.
The politics of fear just
hit the wall. It turned out to be a farce, and, like that Marx Brothers movie, a demagogic dance of hysterical absurdities,
with endless opportunities to waste public money, and an this case, to do deals with your friends and thumb your nose at everyone.
And the president spent the end of the week in Indiana and Ohio, raising more than one and a half million for congressmen
he needs to keep their seats, and saying things like this - "I wish I wasn't talking about war. No president ever says, 'Gosh, I hope there's war.' For those of you who are young
here, I want you to know what I'm leading to is how to keep the peace and do my job that you expect me to do, which is to
prevent the enemy from attacking again."
Right.
But it seems that the final credits are rolling and the lights
are coming up.
Ah, but we will remember some hysterical absurdities with fondness thinking back on it all. Major General
Geoffrey Miller was in charge of Guantánamo from 2002 to 2004, when he was then assigned to make Abu Ghraib in Baghdad work
the same way. Late in the week disclosed a bit more of what was going on in the Muller years at Guantánamo, as reported here (Knight-Ridder) –
Military interrogators
posing as FBI agents at the U.S. detention center at Guantánamo Bay, Cuba, wrapped terrorism suspects in an Israeli flag and
forced them to watch homosexual pornography under strobe lights during interrogation sessions that lasted as long as 18 hours,
according to one of a batch of FBI memos released Thursday.
Absurd, and hysterical
is the other sense of the word. But did it work? That depends –
Military interrogators
"are adamant that their interrogation strategies are the best ones to use despite a lack of evidence of their success,"
[an e-mail] said.
The same e-mail complained that the military officer overseeing interrogations, a lieutenant colonel
whose name was blocked out, "blatantly misled the Pentagon into believing that the (FBI's behavioral-analysis team) had endorsed
the (military's) aggressive and controversial interrogation plan" during a teleconference with Pentagon officials.
Got it? No evidence it
works. So keep doing it. It might, one day. Or not. And the FBI behavioral-analysis guys wanted this crap stopped, and Miller's
guys got on the line and told the Pentagon the FBI said they were doing just the right thing.
Absurd.
You
want absurd? It's not A Passage to India - it's another farce.
First - Bush Prepares For India Trip, Says India Is Responsible Nuclear Nation. Yep, he's going for a visit. Complex stuff. Fast rising economy there, as the have all those industries doing what American
workers used to do, but a great market for American goods - maybe they'll buy our stuff with their new riches. That'd take
off some of the political heat back here regarding outsourcing. And they could be a buffer if China gets uppity. They have
nuclear weapons, but have never signed onto the non-proliferation treaty, and are in conflict with our flakey war on terror
ally Pakistan, and they have nukes there too. Tricky. And the may be the world's largest democracy, but were way friendly
with the Soviets in the Cold War days. The idea is to make 'em happy. Then they'll help us with China and terror, and buy
our stuff.
What to do? Offer them advanced nuclear technology. But of course make them promise to use it only on civilian
stuff. But the offer upset all the national security worriers back here, thus the statements that these Indian folks were
responsible.
It didn't matter. Late Friday they told us to stick our advanced nuclear technology where the sun don't
shine (story here) - seems they don't give a hoot about our economic and political issues with China, and the don't like George treating them
like children he can bribe and fool. It seems they want to be treated as adults, and not like American voters or American
congressmen or senators.
Of course this didn't help - "The United States apologized and granted a visa on Friday to the Indian-born president of a world science
body after he said he was refused entry on charges of hiding information that could be used for chemical weapons."
What?
Professor Goverdhan Mehta, 62, an internationally recognized organic chemist, president of the Paris-based International Council
for Science (ICSU) had been invited to a conference by the University of Florida. Some low-level staffer decided he was a
terrorist and blew him off. He didn't make it. Ah well, it's not just Cat Stevens. This happens to world-famous scientists
all the time. They complain. We look childish and foolish. Maybe we should have Dubai World Ports do the screening.
Of
course it might be this - "George W Bush's protocol handlers have notified South Block that the American President's deep belief in his born-again
faith precludes his visiting Mahatma Gandhi's Samadhi at New Delhi's Raj Ghat - during his forthcoming visit to India."
Nice
move. What? They aren't Methodists over there? What's wrong with them?
It should be an interesting trip. He'll need
to turn on some real Texas charm. Maybe he'll take along our new Minister of Propaganda, Karen Hughes. She can do her "I'm
a mother so I understand" routine that she tried out in the Middle East.
No? It is a Marx brother film.
Ah
well, as for wanting to be treated as adults, and not like American voters or American congressmen or senators, you cannot
beat this –
Remember Total Information
Awareness? The Bush administration does.
Congress thought it killed off the controversial data-mining project in 2003.
"Total Information Awareness is no more," Sen. Ron Wyden declared then. "The lights are out."
The lights may have
gone out at the Defense Department's Information Awareness Office, but it now seems that the Bush administration simply turned
them back on elsewhere. Following up where Newsweek left off earlier this month, the National Journal is reporting that the
administration is still pursuing some of the most important components of TIA under the black umbrella of the National Security
Agency - the same agency tasked with the Bush administration's warrantless spying work.
The National Journal says
the administration and its contractors have hidden the continued existence of TIA components by changing some of their names.
An e-mail message from one contractor suggests that a big component of the project, previously known as the "Information Awareness
Prototype System," now goes by the name "Basketball" instead, the National Journal says. "TIA has been terminated and should
be referenced in that fashion," an employee of the contractor warned his colleagues. Similarly, the National Journal says,
a project once known as "Genoa II" was renamed "Topsail" when it moved from the Defense Department to the NSA's Advanced Research
and Development shop.
As the National Journal notes, Wyden asked FBI Director Robert Mueller and intelligence czar
John Negroponte earlier this month whether TIA operations had been moved rather than shut down. They said they didn't know,
but Gen. Michael Hayden - the former NSA director and point man for the administration's warrantless spying defense - was
a little more circumspect. "I'd like to answer in closed session," he said.
Change the name and no
one will notice. This is the gimmick in more than a few vaudeville routines, and happens in many a farce. That works.
And
on it goes. Anyone could find five or ten such farce stories a day (six more here were dumped as citing more would just be
piling on). So what?
Maybe the "so what" is that all these items, while not that bad in and of themselves, start to
build a growing sense - in those not previously fed up with this combination of incompetence, blind pride and dim-wittedness
- that something is amiss. And maybe something should be done. Maybe the middle will move. The port deal pushed any number
of people over the edge.
It's no fun living in a
farce. You could die.