Last week I commented on
                  advertisers spraying rosemary scents in the Paris metros to encourage these urbanites to vacation in Arles or Aix or wherever.  See the World View item from Wednesday, 3 March 2004 here.  Or scroll down to March 7, 2004 - Will Mel Gibson Conquer France Too? (and a few other odd items).
Last week we got this too: 
Anti-Advertising Group Takes Campaign to Paris Metro 
Tuesday, March 09, 2004, Rebecca Harrison 
The basics are this: 
                   
                  PARIS (Reuters) - With her eyes blackened and her mouth defaced, the leggy blonde pictured eating
                  yogurt on the advertising poster was not looking so hot by the time Robert Johnson had finished with her.  
"Advertising makes you aggressive," scrawled 30-year-old Johnson across the poster in Paris's Republique
                  metro station before glancing furtively over his shoulder, tucking his black marker into his pocket and jumping back on the
                  train.  
Johnson is not just a bored young delinquent.  He and hundreds like him -- they all use the same pseudonym -- are at war with what they call the "tyranny
                  of advertising" and they use paintbrushes, markers and spray cans as their weapons. 
                  
The Paris underground system is their main target.  
Activists
                  have defaced thousands of the poster ads that line its walls, angering authorities and provoking a one million euro ($1.22
                  million) lawsuit, in what they say is an unprecedented campaign against the invasion of public space by big business.  
Inspired by the Canadian-born author Naomi Klein's "No Logo" -- the anti-globalization
                  bible that adorns the bookshelves of generation X-ers from Seattle to Stockholm -- the metro warriors say they are tired of
                  being force-fed advertising.  
"We are not terrorists, we are not vandals,
                  but there is no legal way of fighting back," said 34-year-old Alexandre Baret, one of 62 activists being sued for damages.  
"I feel like I've been taken hostage by advertising, and this is the only
                  way I can make my voice heard." 
                   
                  The whole item is long,
                  with lots of detail.  
The questions raised are discussed, and Metrobus,
                  a unit of advertising major Publicis that manages the advertising space on Paris's public transport, and metro operator RATP,
                  are determined to smash the movement and are suing the activists for one million euros in damages.  The case goes to court March 10th.  
Publicis claims
                  that the advertising is in the public interest because it provides state-owned RATP with 65 million euros a year - enough
                  for 20 new metro carriages or 300 buses.  
And about 270 people were arrested.  Of those, 62 were charged.  
Reuters
                  also reports that philosopher and teacher Vincent Cespedes, who has written several books about the impact of advertising
                  on young people, said an average Parisian is exposed to 2,500 ads a day, and that this feeds greed, alienation and depression.  
He says that in France, unlike in other European countries such as Britain,
                  there is no strict code for advertisers, only a watchdog that rarely intervenes.  
In
                  France, one quickly discovers, sex is used to sell almost anything from holidays to handbags, prompting campaigns by feminist
                  groups that write graffiti over them there naked boobs and butts one sees on metro walls and street-side billboards all over
                  the place.  No wonder they didn't get the American outrage at Janet Jackson.  
"Advertising, particularly in France, totally warps the image young people
                  have of women," said Cespedes.  "One of my pupils said the other day he
                  reckoned white women were all whores because they'd sleep with you for a yogurt." 
Obviously, I need to stock up
                  on yogurt.  
___ 
Over at the Washington Post I see this:
                  
Le Pen Sees His Cause Catching On: French Far-Right Leader's Party Predicted to Fare Well in Regional
                     Ballots 
Keith B.  Richburg, Washington Post Foreign Service, Monday, March 8,
                  2004; Page A12 
                   
                  PARIS - Two years after he shocked the French political establishment with a second-place finish
                  in the country's presidential election, the far-right leader Jean-Marie Le Pen is once again hoping to embarrass the elite
                  and confound the pundits with a stronger-than-expected showing by his National Front party in regional elections later this
                  month.  
"The National Front is going to reach 20 percent nationally,"
                  a beaming Le Pen predicted, in the sitting room of his palatial home in the suburban hills of Saint-Cloud, west of Paris.  
"Everybody is opposed to the National Front," he said.  "Everybody is hostile.  But despite that, we continue to grow."
                  
                   
                  Sigh.  
Le Pen seems to be making the most of the two issues he sees as vote-winners: corruption among
                  the ruling elite and immigration.  He sees the latter as responsible for a host
                  of ills, from rising crime to social tensions highlighted by last week's passage of a law banning Muslim girls' veils from
                  public classrooms.  
Le Pen, in the interview, said he opposed the law
                  - which bans all "ostensible" religious symbols - because it fails to address what he calls the core problem.  "It's not a problem of the veil," he said.  "It's a problem
                  of immigration." 
"Immigration is out of control," Le Pen said.  "We aren't
                  managing the problem." 
Well, he’s seventy-five.  And this former
                  paratrooper says he regularly meets with Frenchmen of North African descent who tell him, "It's crazy to let in everybody."
                  
Yep.  We’ve got Pat Robertson and Lou Dobbs.  They get Jean-Marie 
___ 
Then I hop on the net to watch the French news on TF1 - as they stream the 13h00 and 20h00 broadcasts for me.  And?  “Quelque 900 personnes représentant plus de 2.000 responsables de laboratoires ont signé leur
                  lettre de démission, à l'issue d'une assemblée générale à l'Hôtel de Ville de Paris …” 
Well, if you
                  don’t like watching the French television news in streaming video in French, here’s the scoop – 
See
                  Thousands of French Scientists Revolt 
Tuesday, March 09, 2004, Elaine Ganley, Associated Press Writer 
Our friend Ric at MetropoleParis says there’s always a demonstration of some kind.  
This was Tuesday's
                  -
                   
                  PARIS - More than 2,000 French scientists resigned their administrative duties Tuesday to protest
                  funding cuts they say hobble French research and risk pushing the brightest minds to countries where science is a prestige
                  industry.  
In solidarity, some 5,000 researchers wearing white lab coats
                  marched through Paris after the scientists voted to resign, while thousands of others held protests in other French cities.  
The unprecedented action culminated several months of protests by state-funded
                  researchers over budget cuts, the freezing of funds and a recent decision by the conservative government to eliminate 550
                  full-time research posts.  
"I think the government underestimated our
                  discontent," said Thierry Letellier, of the recently formed group "Let's Save Research." 
                   
                  Demonstrators in white
                  lab coats?  Cool.  Not much like May
                  of 1968, is it?  
Well, Prime Minister Jean-Pierre Raffarin said the previous
                  Friday that the government was prepared to make available up to three percent of the gross domestic product for research by
                  2010.  He pointed out that is at least $3.7 billion extra between now and the
                  end of the current legislature's term in 2007.  Didn’t stop the protests.  But he also said, "We won't do petty bargaining," in an interview published
                  Tuesday in Libération.  
Damn. 
                  
Four of France's leading scientists, including two Nobel prize winners, said in a document sent to Le Monde
                  that the entire French research system, with underpaid and under-appreciated employees, needs a “profound revision.”
                  
And one Bertrand Monthubert, a researcher in mathematics with CNRS in Toulouse, said budget cuts have forced his unit
                  to cancel some conferences, reviews and visits by colleagues from abroad.  And
                  he claimed young researchers change fields or go abroad - adding that he knows "lots" of young researchers who have moved
                  to other European countries or the United States.  
Horrors!  We don’t want them!  We hate the
                  French because they didn’t like our war.  
Who cares?  According to a poll published Tuesday in the daily La Croix, eighty-two percent of the French support
                  the researchers' revolt.  
Really. 
                  
____ 
Finally this: 
Gloves come off in a very French row over defence of the language 
Jon Henley in Paris, The Guardian (UK), Saturday March 6, 2004 
Now here’s one I like, but I used
                  to teach literature and linguistics. 
                   
                  It is the kind of row the French adore, the kind of row, indeed, that could probably only happen
                  in France: two distinguished defenders of the language of Molière slugging it out in the national press over the best way
                  to stem its slow and seemingly inexorable decline.  
In the red corner,
                  Bernard Pivot, who for many years hosted France's main literary TV chat show and still presents its hugely popular annual
                  dictation contest, Les Dicos d'Or; in the blue, Maurice Druon, venomous, arch-conservative octogenarian and former secretary
                  general of the illustrious Académie Française.  
"His great misfortune,"
                  wrote Mr Pivot of Mr Druon in Le Figaro this week, "is that he would like the French language to be in his image: starched,
                  outdated, reactionary, egotistical, haughty, sinister...Under his pen, French is like a Louis XIV chandelier.  How could today's youth want illumination from such an antiquity?" 
But Mr Pivot, fulminated Mr
                  Druon, was merely "an organiser of literary circuses, a presumptuous showman, a parader of dancing bears" who had promoted
                  himself "the nation's chief primary school teacher" and committed the unpardonable sin of "stuffing his most recent dictation
                  with slang".  
                   
                  Wow!  Good stuff!  
Well, you can read everywhere about how
                  English, the language, is really dominating the world.  Will French survive?  
Henley points out that 1986, according to EU figures, 58% of European commission
                  documents were originally published in French, compared with just 30% last year.  As
                  for European council documents, only 28% were written in French last year, against 59% in English - whereas the two languages
                  were level as recently as 1997, at about 42% each.  The new mainly eastern European
                  entrants joining this year, most of whose diplomats prefer English, will inevitably entail a further drastic reduction in
                  the use French.  
Note this: 
                   
                  "What's at stake is the survival of our culture.  It's
                  a matter of life or death," Jacques Viot of the Alliance Française, which promotes French abroad, warned recently.  For Hélène Carrère d'Encausse, Mr Druon's boss at the Académie, "the defence of our language must be the
                  major national cause of the new century".  
For Mr Druon, a leading figure
                  in the conservative camp, rigour and discipline are the answer.  Blaming teachers,
                  television, advertisers, the government, America and Mr Pivot for the decline, he wrote in a full-page article in Le Figaro
                  last week that "a huge effort by the entire French nation" was required.  
Politicians
                  must make the protection of the language a plank of their electoral campaigns, Mr Druon wrote. 
                  Local and regional defence committees must be formed.  Lax teaching methods
                  must be overhauled, incompetent newspaper subeditors sacked, a television language watchdog formed, Anglicisms mercilessly
                  rooted out and destroyed.  
"The French no longer respect their language,"
                  said Mr Druon, "because they are no longer proud of themselves or of their country. 
                  They no longer love themselves, and, no longer loving themselves, they no longer love what was the instrument of their
                  glory - their language."
                   
The sky is falling!  The sky is falling!  
Yeah, and on the other side you have Pivot saying, "a language must continually
                  evolve, open itself up, enrich itself."  That’s the way it is.  His
                  idea?  Don’t worry Anglicisms, neologisms and slang.  Go with the flow and "encourage newcomers, welcome daring inventions." 
Otherwise?  Rejecting and despising them will only mean that French comes to resemble this Druon fellow - "immobile,
                  muffled, mothballed and sclerotic." 
Ouch.  
I love a good
                  fight.  I think I need to go back and read Samuel Johnson on why English doesn’t
                  need any "academy" to keep things pure.  We like our language messay, and growing, and full of borrowed terms. 
                  Heck, it more fun that way.   And you can say more, actually.