Just Above Sunset
January 16, 2005 - Understanding Joan of Arc
|
|||||
The argument here is that the religious right
doesn’t know much about religion. Money quote – "… according
to a 1997 poll, only one out of three U.S. citizens is able to name the most basic of Christian texts, the four Gospels, and
12% think Noah's wife was Joan of Arc." Ha! Well, close enough. Actually,
the fellow below argues one should teach, in public schools, what each religion is basically about. Not a bad idea. He says that in Europe, "religious education
is the rule from the elementary grades on. So Austrians, Norwegians and the Irish can tell you about the Seven Deadly Sins
or the Five Pillars of Islam." But
we cannot be like the wimpy Europeans, can we? Knowing just what are the Five
Pillars of Islam too could be dangerous – that might corrupt our pure youth and all that. I used to teach, each year when I was an English
teacher in the seventies, a course required in that private school, The Bible as Literature.
It wasn’t religious instruction. I had no problem with it. But I suspect I did more harm than good. But
for your amusement note this A Nation of Faith and Religious Illiterates Stephen Prothero, Los Angeles Times, Wednesday, January 12, 2005 The
Times tells us Prothero teaches at Boston University and is author of "American Jesus: How the Son of God Became a National
Icon" (Farrar, Strauss and Giroux, 2003). The sociologist Peter Berger once remarked
that if India is the most religious country in the world and Sweden the least, then the United States is a nation of Indians
ruled by Swedes. Not anymore. With a Jesus lover in the Oval Office and a faith-based party in control of both houses of Congress,
the United States is undeniably a nation of believers ruled by the same. And Prothero goes on to show how little folks
actually know about the Bible, much less other religions. The public policy problem? Since 9/11, President Bush has been
telling us that "Islam is a religion of peace," while evangelist Franklin Graham (Billy's son) has insisted otherwise. Who
is right? Americans have no way to tell because they know virtually nothing about Islam. Such ignorance imperils our public
life, putting citizens in the thrall of talking heads. Yeah, what else is new? If Rush Limbaugh says it, or Robert Novak, it must be so. Now that the religious right has triumphed
over the secular left, every politician seems determined to get religion. They're all asking "What Would Jesus Do?" —
about the war in Iraq, gay marriage, poverty and Social Security. And though the ACLU may rage, it is not un-American to bring
religious reasoning into our public debates. In fact, that has been happening ever since George Washington put his hand on
a Bible and swore to uphold the Constitution. What is un-American is to give those debates over to televangelists of either
the secular or the religious variety, to absent ourselves from the discussion by ignorance. But
my friend Dick in Rochester gets to the heart of the problem - First - I am something with smatterings of pantheism and agnosticism, with mostly "don't care." But I have long thought that a few years in school with comparative religion and how it impacted and was
impacted by the world would be a great idea; however, where would be the agreed upon objectivity? Hell, I know that my religion is better than yours, even I don't have one. Were the good guys the exporters of Islam a few hundred years ago or the Richard and the other Crusaders? Ain't none of them untainted by politics. And with God speaking
to so many people in conflicting ways can you tell the students that everyone is wacko?
Might have some repercussions. Unfortunately not teaching anything has
not been real successful either. |
||||
This issue updated and published on...
Paris readers add nine hours....
|
||||