Just Above Sunset
June 19, 2005 - Cruise, Holmes, Dump Cruz and Klein, Climb Eiffel
|
|||||
This just in from Our
Man in Paris, Ric Erickson, editor of MetropoleParis: __ A couple of new details emerged on tonight's TV-news. Cruise is apparently a major economic motor for the cinemas in Marseille. They threw him a fine party down there, and he seemed to enjoy it too much - or, are his drugs always wearing
off? Between looking stupidly stunned, he lights up with these crazed grins. Maybe there was too much oxygen on the TGV. Copyright © 2005 – Ric Erickson, MetropoleParis __ Reactions from the Just
Above Sunset online salon – the email group – From the Wall Street attorney – The truly sad thing
is that I can't tell if this is true or a joke. What is truly
even more sad is that I really don't care. The response from Hollywood
to Wall Street? It's true, it's true, it's really true…. See Reuters, as they covered it here - And the French do consider scientology a sect, not a religion – which no one in
Hollywood understands… The BBC five years ago - A government committee in France has
recommended dissolving the Church of Scientology there, on the grounds that its activities threatens public order. And see this (June 9 – a few weeks ago) - Hollywood
star Tom Cruise refuses to accept there is a negative attitude to Scientology, insisting the public are curious to find out
more about the Ron L Hubbard-founded faith. We're in deep waters here. Bob Patterson, our odd columnist, says the waters are really deep. BEING AND NOTHINGNESS Obviously, Cruise is displaying his propensity for existentialism by choosing to ask Ms. Holmes for her hand in marriage.
Obviously be choosing to be a married man, he is subtly endorsing traditional family values. Obviously by choosing the
romantic setting of the Eiffel Tower, he is showing that he is a sensitive male and a traditional romantic. Obviously
by holding a news conference he is endorsing Marshall McLuhan's "The Medium
is the Message" world-village premise. Obviously be causally mentioning the two movies (the new Batman and War
of the Worlds) the couple is affirming their belief that life will continue well into the future and that capitalism (and
democracy) works. Would Sartre catch all these subtleties? Would Camus dissent? This will obviously crowd the war in Iraq and that out-of-control Senator
guy from Illinois off the evening news. Can't you just see Bush smiling approvingly? Oh,
it's not THAT deep. And all the media covered it. __ The question is what is such celebrity news doing
in Just Above Sunset – is this a tabloid? Celebrity
news doesn't appear here much, not even Brad Pitt stuff, even what he said in Africa about the starving children whist there
with the lovely daughter of Jon Voigt. Sean Penn is in Iran at the moment, playing
at being a left-wing journalist - not in a movie, as he's actually reporting for the San Francisco Chronicle. And what's this about Katie Holmes converting to scientology because she's tight with
Tom Cruise, who embarrassed himself so badly on the Oprah Winfrey Show a few weeks back, jumping on the sofa and screaming
he loved Katie, then dissolving into a giggling mess? Shouldn't a publication
from Hollywood cover such things? Yeah. Later. The
JAS editorial policy is now this: JAS covers what the editor likes, and publishes Bob Patterson's columns without restrictions,
and posts Ric's Paris columns, and Don Smith's Paris photos, and Phillip Raines' treehouse stuff, and so on... and if there's
an audience that likes the mix, fine. If not?
Fine, as they can go where they find what they like. No trying to be relevant
or popular. It is what it is. The
counter on the home page now reads about 100,500 visitors since it was installed eighteen months ago. That'll do. |
||||
This issue updated and published on...
Paris readers add nine hours....
|
||||